Non-Disclosure Agreements for Mergers and Acquisitions

nat rosasco • September 5, 2018

In almost every merger and acquisition (M&A) transaction the buyer and seller need to share certain confidential information to evaluate the merits of and negotiate the terms of the potential deal (such as financial information, material contracts and customer information). The path to providing information safely is making sure the other party is bound to respect the confidential nature of the information and not use such information in a way that causes harm to the disclosing party.



Using a Non-Disclosure Agreement is a common way to protect your company’s sensitive information when it is shared with another party. These agreements are also known as “Confidentiality Agreements” or, as it will be referred to here, an “NDA”. Unfortunately, no document is going to guarantee that an unethical person won’t use shared confidential information in a nefarious manner, however, an NDA will certainly reduce the risk of a potential buyer disclosing sensitive information about your business or using that information in some competitive manner. If they do, then at a minimum you as the seller have a legal cause of action against them and most sophisticated buyers, and even competitors, won’t take that risk.

While there are many details of an NDA that bear scrutiny, our focus in this post is determining exactly what is considered confidential information.


What is Considered Confidential?

The definition of “Confidential Information” in the context of an NDA is generally described in very broad terms and can vary from one NDA to the next. There is of course a natural divergence of interests between buyers and sellers in defining Confidential Information, as sellers want as broad a definition as possible to protect their business and buyers want to narrow the definition. A compromise that most buyers and seller’s reach is a very broad definition of Confidential Information with certain exceptions, typically including: (1) any information that is already known to the public at the time that it is communicated to the potential buyer, (2) information that becomes publicly known after the seller discloses it to the potential buyer (other than through the fault of the potential buyer or its representatives) or (3) information that is required to be disclosed by law or a court of competent jurisdiction.

So what exactly is considered confidential? Here are some practical examples of information and documentation that would typically be protected under an NDA:

·     Financial and statistical data

·     Computer programs and other software

·     Sales, customer and client information

·     Business methodologies

·     Patentable and unpatentable inventions, discoveries, know-how, works of authorship and    trade secrets

·     Techniques, strategies, plans and tactics

·    Samples, test results and other test data

·     Prototypes, drawings, computations, processes and data

·     Information related to the current, future and proposed products and services of the company, including any research, experimental work, development, design details, specifications, samples, designs and models

·    Employee information


In addition to protecting the confidential information of a business, an NDA should also prohibit a potential buyer from disclosing information about the potential transaction. In particular, the buyer should not be permitted to disclose to third parties any of the terms, conditions or other facts related to the negotiations between the parties. The NDA should also provide that a buyer is only permitted to use the seller’s confidential information for purposes of evaluating the potential transaction and disclosure should be limited only to such buyer’s advisors.


A sophisticated buyer will understand the need to execute an NDA that prevents the buyer from using or disclosing the seller’s confidential information. This confidential information is a very valuable asset of the seller’s business, and, while the buyer needs to evaluate such information, it is critical that this information is not disclosed by the buyer to third parties or used by the buyer for any purpose other than evaluating the seller’s business in connection with a potential transaction.


The following is a sample clause defining “Confidential Information” in an NDA:

As used in this Agreement, the term "Confidential Information" means and includes any and all information, techniques, plans, designs, costs, pricing, finances, research and development activities, Supplier specifications, supplier lists, business opportunities, personnel, and/or data disclosed by a party (the "Disclosing Party") to the other party (the "Receiving Party") before, on, or after the date hereof which relates in any manner, directly or indirectly, to the Disclosing Party and/or its customers, suppliers and Customers, whether such information is disclosed in writing, verbally, electronically, or otherwise, and which information the Disclosing Party maintains as confidential. Notwithstanding the foregoing, information and/or data shall not be considered Confidential Information if such information and/or data is: (i) established by the Receiving Party to have been known by it at the time of receipt, (ii) or becomes a part of the public domain through no direct or indirect act or omission of the Receiving Party, or (iii) received by the Receiving Party from a third party without similar restrictions, (iv) is independently developed by the Receiving Party without using any Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party, or (v) is approved for release by the Disclosing Party in writing and is released consistent with such approval.


If you need assistance preparing an NDA, or have questions about purchasing or selling a business, the attorneys at Grogan Hesse & Uditsky, P.C. are here to help. Visit us at www.ghulaw.com for more information.

By Jordan Uditsky January 4, 2022
An amendment to the Mechanics Lien Act (the "Act') permits the bonding over of mechanic's liens in the State of Illinois. The bill was signed into law ( 770 ILCS 60/38.1 ) on July 28, 2015, and went into effect on January 1, 2016. This statute is significant because it allows parties to "clear title" to real property that would otherwise be subject to a mechanic's lien. An eligible applicant will be permitted to substitute a bond for the real property subject to the underlying mechanic's lien so that the lien attaches to the bond instead of the real property. Who is Eligible? To take advantage of 770 ILCS 60/38.1 , the party desiring to bond over the lien must be an eligible applicant. The statute defines applicant relatively broadly to include the following parties: An owner; Other lien claimant; A party that has an interest in the property subject to the lien claim; An association representing owners organized under any statute or to which the Common Interest Community Association Act applies; or Any person who may be liable for the payment of the lien claim, including an owner, former owner, association representing owners organized under any statute or to which the Common Interest Community Association Act applies, or the contractor or subcontractor. Process for Filing a Petition To effectively substitute the bond for the real property, the applicant must file a petition with the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the property subject to the underlying lien claim is located. The petition must include the following: The name and address of the applicant and the applicant's attorney, if any; The name and address of the lien claimant; If there is a pending action to enforce the claim, the name of the attorney of record, or if there is no pending claim, but the claim has been recorded, the name of the preparer of the lien claim; The name and address of the owner of record of any real estate subject to the claim or the name and address of the homeowners association or the condominium association; A legal description of the property; A copy of the lien claim; A copy of the proposed eligible surety bond; A certified copy of the surety's certificate of authority from the Department of Insurance or the state agency charged with the duty to issue the certificate; and An undertaking by the applicant to replace the bond with another eligible surety bond in the event that the proposed eligible surety bond ceases to be an eligible bond. After filing a proper petition, the applicant must provide notice and a copy of the petition, either by personal service or certified mail, to every party whose name and address is stated in the petition and the lien party's attorney of record. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise business owners in the Chicago area.
By Lou Chronowski November 10, 2021
“Pandemic Impact? - New York Federal Court Allows Termination Dispute to Proceed” 
By Lou Chronowski October 19, 2021
Welcome to GHU’s newest blog – On the Move: The Future is Now! This blog focuses on legal and policy issues facing the vehicle industry. The future is now for the vehicle industry. Some states (CA and MA) have issued mandates requiring that vehicle manufacturers stop selling new ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles by 2035. Most legacy vehicle manufacturers have made various announcements stating that their respective product portfolios will move from ICE to zero emission vehicles (EVs) over the next 10-14 years. Another significant issue facing the issue relates to how vehicles are purchased. Over the past several years, Tesla has charted a distribution model that rejects traditional dealerships and uses direct sales and service. Other EV manufacturers like Rivian and Lucid appear to be headed in a similar direction. It is well known that Apple and Amazon have plans to enter the vehicle space as well. Consumers will have a large role in determining how they want to purchase vehicles and vehicle services (much the same as they did with respect to on-demand transportation with the likes of Uber and Lyft). The question is whether traditional manufacturers will be kept on an uneven playing field with these newer market entrants. Finally, autonomous vehicles (AVs) are right around the corner as well. In addition to consumer adoption and acceptance of EVs, it is still unknown how consumers will react to AVs and whether AVs have a large role in America. The future is now. The changes in the industry are happening now and happening at fast pace. This blog will continue to explore issues facing the vehicle industry. For 20 years, Lou Chronowski has represented motor vehicle manufacturers helping them navigate complex laws and regulations and litigating disputes against dealers. If you have any questions, please contact Lou at lchronowski@ghulaw.com .
Show More