Mechanics Liens: What you don’t know can hurt you

Amy Grogan • April 24, 2019

In most aspects of law, mistakes can be made and fixed. However, if you are a contractor or subcontractor, an individual buying a recently renovated or new construction home, or a corporation who is having work performed on your property, it is important to understand that Mechanics Liens are a different animal.

 

What is a Mechanics Lien? In short, it is a method by which a contractor or subcontractor can place a lien on a property if they have not been paid for the work performed or materials provided. The law within Illinois on Mechanics Liens is statutory in nature and strictly construed. A statute that is strictly construed must be followed exactly.

 

What does that mean for you?

 

The steps that must be taken to perfect a Mechanics Lien depend on the form of the lien being sought, the parties involved (contractor vs. subcontractor), the type of work (public or private construction), and whom the lien is against (owner, lender or third party).

 

For example, any subcontractor who is working a private construction project must provide notice of the lien claim within 90 days of the last date the subcontractor performed work or delivered material to the project. This form of notice must be done in a very specific way, and any variance will defeat a party’s lien claim. For instance, sending a notice of a Mechanics Lien claim via regular mail is a fatal error. Notice under these circumstances must be delivered via certified or registered mail with return receipt requested and delivery limited to addressee only, to the owner of record or via personal service (see 770 ILCS 60/24 for more details.) Similarly, the lien must be recorded within a prescribed period of time, and generally must be recorded within four months of the last date worked. A failure to record within the prescribed period of time is again fatal to a Mechanics Lien claim. If performed correctly, the Mechanics Lien dates back to the date of the contract between the owner and the contractor so that the contractor has priority over those who purchase the property after the contract.

 

What does this mean for a homebuyer or investor? Legally, the lien dates back to the time of the contract and that lien will take precedence over a later purchase. In layman’s terms, you need to be certain all contractors and subcontractors have been paid prior to purchase. Otherwise, you will be responsible for to pay outstanding balances even if you did not know they existed. Normally a lien will appear on a title check, but if the home has undergone recent construction, this is a danger to be aware of.

 

Mechanics Liens are an integral tool in Illinois construction law. However, the statutory guidelines are often overlooked and errors in the perfection of Mechanics Liens are frequently discovered after it is too late. If you have any questions regarding your Mechanics Lien rights or other construction law, please contact our litigation team at Grogan, Hesse and Uditsky.

By Jordan Uditsky January 4, 2022
An amendment to the Mechanics Lien Act (the "Act') permits the bonding over of mechanic's liens in the State of Illinois. The bill was signed into law ( 770 ILCS 60/38.1 ) on July 28, 2015, and went into effect on January 1, 2016. This statute is significant because it allows parties to "clear title" to real property that would otherwise be subject to a mechanic's lien. An eligible applicant will be permitted to substitute a bond for the real property subject to the underlying mechanic's lien so that the lien attaches to the bond instead of the real property. Who is Eligible? To take advantage of 770 ILCS 60/38.1 , the party desiring to bond over the lien must be an eligible applicant. The statute defines applicant relatively broadly to include the following parties: An owner; Other lien claimant; A party that has an interest in the property subject to the lien claim; An association representing owners organized under any statute or to which the Common Interest Community Association Act applies; or Any person who may be liable for the payment of the lien claim, including an owner, former owner, association representing owners organized under any statute or to which the Common Interest Community Association Act applies, or the contractor or subcontractor. Process for Filing a Petition To effectively substitute the bond for the real property, the applicant must file a petition with the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the property subject to the underlying lien claim is located. The petition must include the following: The name and address of the applicant and the applicant's attorney, if any; The name and address of the lien claimant; If there is a pending action to enforce the claim, the name of the attorney of record, or if there is no pending claim, but the claim has been recorded, the name of the preparer of the lien claim; The name and address of the owner of record of any real estate subject to the claim or the name and address of the homeowners association or the condominium association; A legal description of the property; A copy of the lien claim; A copy of the proposed eligible surety bond; A certified copy of the surety's certificate of authority from the Department of Insurance or the state agency charged with the duty to issue the certificate; and An undertaking by the applicant to replace the bond with another eligible surety bond in the event that the proposed eligible surety bond ceases to be an eligible bond. After filing a proper petition, the applicant must provide notice and a copy of the petition, either by personal service or certified mail, to every party whose name and address is stated in the petition and the lien party's attorney of record. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise business owners in the Chicago area.
By Lou Chronowski November 10, 2021
“Pandemic Impact? - New York Federal Court Allows Termination Dispute to Proceed” 
By Lou Chronowski October 19, 2021
Welcome to GHU’s newest blog – On the Move: The Future is Now! This blog focuses on legal and policy issues facing the vehicle industry. The future is now for the vehicle industry. Some states (CA and MA) have issued mandates requiring that vehicle manufacturers stop selling new ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles by 2035. Most legacy vehicle manufacturers have made various announcements stating that their respective product portfolios will move from ICE to zero emission vehicles (EVs) over the next 10-14 years. Another significant issue facing the issue relates to how vehicles are purchased. Over the past several years, Tesla has charted a distribution model that rejects traditional dealerships and uses direct sales and service. Other EV manufacturers like Rivian and Lucid appear to be headed in a similar direction. It is well known that Apple and Amazon have plans to enter the vehicle space as well. Consumers will have a large role in determining how they want to purchase vehicles and vehicle services (much the same as they did with respect to on-demand transportation with the likes of Uber and Lyft). The question is whether traditional manufacturers will be kept on an uneven playing field with these newer market entrants. Finally, autonomous vehicles (AVs) are right around the corner as well. In addition to consumer adoption and acceptance of EVs, it is still unknown how consumers will react to AVs and whether AVs have a large role in America. The future is now. The changes in the industry are happening now and happening at fast pace. This blog will continue to explore issues facing the vehicle industry. For 20 years, Lou Chronowski has represented motor vehicle manufacturers helping them navigate complex laws and regulations and litigating disputes against dealers. If you have any questions, please contact Lou at lchronowski@ghulaw.com .
Show More