Before You Sign: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

nat rosasco • December 13, 2018

 The first step in beginning many new business relationships is executing a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), also known as a confidentiality agreement. The NDA protects and provides instructions to handle non-public information. It’s also likely the first time two parties negotiate a written contract, providing insight on their document review, responsiveness, and willingness to compromise. The NDA is a safeguard and first impression that you shouldn’t take lightly.

 

In this article I review some of the more common provisions in the NDA and detail how you should approach them. Keep in mind that reviewing the document is just one part; you also must analyze the confidential information that you’ll be sharing. I rarely review an NDA without first discussing with my client what the transaction is about and what non-public material will pass to the other side.     After you appreciate the information you’ll be sharing, then you’ll be in position to analyze your counterpart’s NDA.

 

   1)   Make it mutual.

       If you’re handed an NDA, the first thing to check is whether it’s one-way or mutual. One-way NDAs protect only one party’s information, and put all of the obligations to keep that information confidential on the other party. Unless you have little-to-no bargaining power, you should not accept a one-way NDA (and even then you should ask for mutual protection). Most businesses will readily accept a mutual NDA when asked. Since an NDA doesn’t guarantee that you’ll be doing business with your counterparty, you shouldn’t risk sharing your confidential information with no protection.

 

   2)  Watch out for other contract obligations.

       Sometimes you’ll be faced with an NDA that tries to do too much. Pricing terms, supply obligations, personnel decisions, etc., do not belong in an NDA. The NDA should not guarantee any terms for future performance. After all, the parties will only begin sharing their information after signing the NDA. You’ll likely find something unexpected that will change your preconception of the deal. Leave the transaction obligations for a later contract once you’ve had time to analyze your counterpart’s data. You don’t want to be held to a promise that you can’t later keep because you didn’t have all of the details.

 

   3)  Don’t give away your intellectual property (IP) rights.

       Part of your own internal review will include identifying your confidential IP. Perhaps your counterpart is interested in paying you to use that IP. That’s great! But don’t give away your IP rights in an overeager NDA. If you need to share your confidential IP then make sure there’s nothing in the NDA that allows your counterpart to use it outside of the scope of the NDA. The NDA should not grant the other side to license or own your IP or anything they derive from that IP. If you want to collaborate on creating something new, then negotiate a separate contract to handle that.

 

  4)    Establish an end date.

       Many NDAs are silent as to their duration or require the receiving party to protect confidential information indefinitely. There is rarely – if ever – information that warrants your protection for more than a few years in the business world. Technology advances, vendors change, and processes become obsolete. You don’t want contracts holding you to obligations forever. Down the road they could lead to a mistaken breach or create an issue when you need to disclose all of your contracts, such as during an asset sale. The caveat is trade secrets which should remain secret. Get an end date for everything else.

 

  5)   Give some extra attention to the dispute resolution.

       It’s great to be excited about a potential deal with your counterpart, but don’t breeze through the dispute resolution provisions in NDAs. “We’re on the same page, this deal will never be an issue!” is a common sentiment and later regret of every manager who’s had to litigate a contract dispute. NDA dispute resolution is atypical to most contracts because it often includes non-monetary relief, such as an injunction. That type of relief is okay, but don’t give up your power to contest a claim, be served, or other due process rights. Dispute resolution provisions in NDAs tend to get bloated, so read them carefully in case they over-reach.

 

       The NDA is the door to many promising business relationships, but don’t rush through. Negotiate the NDA like any other contract and display your sophistication to your counterpart. Dedicate some time to ensure it’s fair, and that it sufficiently protects your own confidential information. Your business will be better for it.

By Jordan Uditsky January 4, 2022
An amendment to the Mechanics Lien Act (the "Act') permits the bonding over of mechanic's liens in the State of Illinois. The bill was signed into law ( 770 ILCS 60/38.1 ) on July 28, 2015, and went into effect on January 1, 2016. This statute is significant because it allows parties to "clear title" to real property that would otherwise be subject to a mechanic's lien. An eligible applicant will be permitted to substitute a bond for the real property subject to the underlying mechanic's lien so that the lien attaches to the bond instead of the real property. Who is Eligible? To take advantage of 770 ILCS 60/38.1 , the party desiring to bond over the lien must be an eligible applicant. The statute defines applicant relatively broadly to include the following parties: An owner; Other lien claimant; A party that has an interest in the property subject to the lien claim; An association representing owners organized under any statute or to which the Common Interest Community Association Act applies; or Any person who may be liable for the payment of the lien claim, including an owner, former owner, association representing owners organized under any statute or to which the Common Interest Community Association Act applies, or the contractor or subcontractor. Process for Filing a Petition To effectively substitute the bond for the real property, the applicant must file a petition with the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the property subject to the underlying lien claim is located. The petition must include the following: The name and address of the applicant and the applicant's attorney, if any; The name and address of the lien claimant; If there is a pending action to enforce the claim, the name of the attorney of record, or if there is no pending claim, but the claim has been recorded, the name of the preparer of the lien claim; The name and address of the owner of record of any real estate subject to the claim or the name and address of the homeowners association or the condominium association; A legal description of the property; A copy of the lien claim; A copy of the proposed eligible surety bond; A certified copy of the surety's certificate of authority from the Department of Insurance or the state agency charged with the duty to issue the certificate; and An undertaking by the applicant to replace the bond with another eligible surety bond in the event that the proposed eligible surety bond ceases to be an eligible bond. After filing a proper petition, the applicant must provide notice and a copy of the petition, either by personal service or certified mail, to every party whose name and address is stated in the petition and the lien party's attorney of record. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise business owners in the Chicago area.
By Lou Chronowski November 10, 2021
“Pandemic Impact? - New York Federal Court Allows Termination Dispute to Proceed” 
By Lou Chronowski October 19, 2021
Welcome to GHU’s newest blog – On the Move: The Future is Now! This blog focuses on legal and policy issues facing the vehicle industry. The future is now for the vehicle industry. Some states (CA and MA) have issued mandates requiring that vehicle manufacturers stop selling new ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles by 2035. Most legacy vehicle manufacturers have made various announcements stating that their respective product portfolios will move from ICE to zero emission vehicles (EVs) over the next 10-14 years. Another significant issue facing the issue relates to how vehicles are purchased. Over the past several years, Tesla has charted a distribution model that rejects traditional dealerships and uses direct sales and service. Other EV manufacturers like Rivian and Lucid appear to be headed in a similar direction. It is well known that Apple and Amazon have plans to enter the vehicle space as well. Consumers will have a large role in determining how they want to purchase vehicles and vehicle services (much the same as they did with respect to on-demand transportation with the likes of Uber and Lyft). The question is whether traditional manufacturers will be kept on an uneven playing field with these newer market entrants. Finally, autonomous vehicles (AVs) are right around the corner as well. In addition to consumer adoption and acceptance of EVs, it is still unknown how consumers will react to AVs and whether AVs have a large role in America. The future is now. The changes in the industry are happening now and happening at fast pace. This blog will continue to explore issues facing the vehicle industry. For 20 years, Lou Chronowski has represented motor vehicle manufacturers helping them navigate complex laws and regulations and litigating disputes against dealers. If you have any questions, please contact Lou at lchronowski@ghulaw.com .
Show More